|
Post by phalange3 on Oct 12, 2016 23:59:17 GMT
Whereas, approximately 1 in 5 children and adolescents in the United States meet diagnostic criteria for mental health or substance abuse disorder that interferes with daily functioning, while only 20% of these children receive the mental health services they need, and
Whereas, poor behavioral, mental, and emotional support in childhood leads to poor health and life outcomes, which is shown in the fact that 1.26 million (50%) prisoners in the United States have some form mental illness and half of all mental health disorders in adults
emerge by the age of 14 years old, therefore be it
RESOLVED, that the Academy identify existing facilities and state/local mental health resources for children and improve access to these facilities and resources; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Academy advocate for funding to create additional mental health facilities and resources for children.
LEAD AUTHOR: Kym Do, MD
|
|
|
Post by cpulcini on Oct 15, 2016 11:15:36 GMT
I also fully support this resolution, but should mention our AAP Federal Affairs Office has a long history of robustly supporting mental health issues for children (https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/federal-advocacy/Pages/mentalhealth.aspx?nfstatus=401&nftoken=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000&nfstatusdescription=ERROR%3a+No+local+token) along with improved access to services for mental health. The creation of new facilities however does add something to their current efforts, but I am wondering if they have explored this before and/or adding facilities is more complicated. The author may be well served by contacting the AAP Federal Affairs Office or Division of State Governmental Affairs directly and inquiring, and any SOPT Executive Committee member could help facilitate that communication.
|
|
|
Post by jwschreiber on Oct 16, 2016 20:04:46 GMT
I'm in agreement with the importance of new facilities, though what does that mean, do you mean more inpatient psychiatric units, more community based services such as WRAP, Partial programs, etc and also who is going to staff these facilities with current lack of providers. Though I agree for acute issues sometimes the facilities is the problem I would take a more global approach and before submitting this in its final form think of the many other factors and maybe ways that the AAP can be more directly involved (eg. continued education around mental health prescribing for pediatricians or funding for more collaborative models)
|
|
zarah
New Member
Posts: 12
|
Post by zarah on Oct 20, 2016 17:54:33 GMT
I agree with the above commenter. Mental health access for children is incredibly important, but the AAP already has a substantial body of policy on the issue, and this resolution doesn't seem to add anything substantially new to the existing policy.
|
|
|
Post by Sarah on Oct 22, 2016 0:23:39 GMT
I'd say "no" to how the resolution is currently written. I don't think the AAP should have to find the resources for mental health. The other ask is too vague.
|
|